Sir if Comparative FST approach is followed but audit of P.Y. is done by other CA or not done at all; and since audit is not done by CY auditor, he cannot give reference to PY in his audit report. then how can users come to know whether it is Comparative or corresponding FST approach when auditor cannot give reference to PY? AND in such situation if auditor comes across some matter where he is required to give modified opinion, then can he give so on PY's FST? If yes, then he will also be required to do audit again which was already done by some other CA. How will auditor deal in such a situation?
ANSWERED Ravi answered 5 days ago    Category:
1 answer
0 vote